Neocon Gingrich Demands Muslims Be Profiled as Terrorists

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
December 30, 2009

Newt Gingrich said in a twitter the other day that the government needs to begin profiling people in response to the staged Christmas day underwear non-bombing. “We need a new policy of systematically going after terrorists that involves explicit profiling and explicit discrimination for behavior,” said the prominent neocon. “It is time to go to profiling of dangerous people.”

	Neocons such as Newt Gingrich want to create a Nazi-like profiling system.

Neocon talk radio host Mike Gallagher threw in his two cents. “There should be a separate line to scrutinize anybody with the name Abdul or Ahmed or Mohammed,” he said. Gallagher is a regular at Fox News and often fills in for the “great American” (great for cheer-leading wars and illegal occupations) Sean Hannity.

Gingrich, Gallagher, and the neocons are taking their cues from Rep. Peter King of New York who raised the idea of profiling people based on their religions.

Newt Gingrich is a top neocon mobster at both the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution. He served on the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board along with arch criminal Henry Kissinger, the Prince of Darkness Richard Perle, and former CIA boss James Woolsey. The Pentagon has historically packed the Board with operatives from Bechtel, Boeing, TRW, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, and other death merchants. Gingrich, the neocon cabal, and the Board are directly responsible for the murder of 1.2 million people in Iraq.

As Infowars and Prison Planet have detailed over the last few days, the Muslim would-be underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab is an obvious patsy who is currently being used to create a new state of irrational hysteria, calls for draconian limitations on civil liberties, and demands that the poverty-stricken state of Yemen be attacked and more innocents slaughtered.

It is not surprising that Gingrich and his crew of fellow neocons are calling for Nazi-like measures against Muslims. Neocons were sidelined after the election of Wall Street front man Barack Obama. However, with this latest orchestrated effort to reinvigorate the flagging war on terror, they are once again chortling for mass murder and profiling of Muslims akin to Nazis profiling Jews in Germany.

Neocons love the orchestrated underwear non-bombing incident because it once again thrusts them into the limelight and rekindles their warped and sadistic fantasies of stinking pyres of mass murdered Muslims from Yemen to Iran and beyond.

Research related links

1. Neocon Gingrich Fearmongers Nuked City in Order to Bust Due Process
2. Newt Gingrich: Sabotage Iran’s Oil Infrastructure
3. Gingrich: Bush Should Have Allowed Terror Attacks
4. Another Neocon Demands Mass Amnesia
5. Self Righteous Neocon Republicans Complain about DHS Report
6. Gingrich retracts comment calling Sotomayor racist, but offers no apology
7. Neocon Malkin Gets Donut Ad Bounced
8. Believe in 9/11 Truth? Newt Says You’re Insane
9. Gingrich: Clinton Will Take Nomination
10. Neocon DoD Blogger Slams Ron Paul
11. Islamic group says four alleged US plotters ‘not real Muslims’
12. Olbermann’s Disgust with the Neocon “Tribute” to 9/11

Neocon Bolton Says Gaza Conflict May Result in U.S. Attack on Iran

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Top Neo-Con John Bolton told Fox News yesterday that the conflict in Gaza could lead to a U.S. attack on Iran as the former U.S. ambassador to the UN exploited the crisis to propagandize for a new war.

“So while our focus obviously is on Gaza right now, this could turn out to be a much larger conflict,” said Bolton, adding that “we’re looking at potentially a multi-front war here.”

“I don’t think there’s anything at this point standing between Iran and nuclear weapons other than the possibility of the use of military force possibly by the United States, possibly by Israel,” added the former ambassador, suggesting that a strike on Iran’s facilities by Israel alone would be risky but could push Iran back by three or four years.

Bolton’s ceaseless fearmongering about Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon contradicts the U.S. intelligence community’s own National Intelligence Estimate, which concluded that Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and was highly unlikely to develop a nuclear weapon this decade.

Bolton’s implication that other Arab states would support an attack on Iran to prevent them from obtaining nuclear weapons, and in his own words “pop champagne corks,” is a ludicrous claim. Bolton is actually trying to suggest that Arabs celebrate when the U.S. attacks the Middle East. The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan alone have stoked anti-US sentiment across the Middle East and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, far from being viewed as a dangerous tyrant, is seen as more of a “hero” across the Middle East, according to a2007 L.A. Times investigative report.

Watch the clip.