Conflicts of interest? Clinton Foundation top donors include Norway, Saudi Arabia, Gates Foundation

COMMENT: The original headline, ‘Clinton donor list doesn’t say who gave in ‘09′ reflects an earlier lack of reporting; the Foundation has now updated with greater disclosure. As the AP reports, “The foundation released a donor list Friday morning that didn’t identify who gave in 2009, but then updated it to provide that information.” Therefore, Business Week’s headline is no longer up-to-date while the report is still worthwhile.

SHARON THEIMER and LARRY MARGASAK
Business Week
January 1, 2010

SEE ALSO: Foreign governments among Clinton donors

Former President Bill Clinton’s charity released a donor list Friday under an agreement with President Barack Obama to prevent conflicts with Hillary Rodham Clinton’s role as secretary of state, but it failed to identify who gave in 2009, her first year in the Cabinet post.

The donor list disclosed by the William J. Clinton Foundation did show that conservative Richard Scaife, who bankrolled anti-Clinton investigations in the 1990s, pitched in money. Also, Saudi Arabia and Norway each donated in the range of $10 million to $25 million to the former president’s charity. Several other foreign governments, including Kuwait, also participated. The biggest donors included the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which gave more than $25 million.

The contributors also included troubled insurance giant American International Group, banking industry fixture Citigroup, Inc. and entertain Barbra Streisand’s foundation.

Clinton foundation spokesman Matt McKenna said that the Saudi government didn’t send money to the foundation in 2009. He said the list doesn’t single out those who contributed since Mrs. Clinton became secretary of state early last year, but rather identifies donors who have given over a period of years. Many of the names among the thousands on the list also appeared on the first list the Clintons released in December 2008, and there was no way to discern whether these donors also gave last year.

READ FULL ARTICLE

Research related links

1. Lawsuit Attempts to Blame Saudi Arabia for September 11 Attacks
2. Hacked climate emails include calls for ‘Earth Government’ as foundation of new world order, splitting of America
3. Saudi Arabia Calls for an Independent Investigation into Climategate
4. Obama ‘Less Transparent’ Than Bush & Cheney on Campaign Donors
5. Hillary Clinton promises new foreign policy approach
6. Barack Obama doesn’t rule out Hillary Clinton for vice president
7. Media Not Reporting Failed Financial Agencies Are Big Donors to Obama
8. Political Insiders: Clinton Will Bounce Back
9. Judicial Watch: Clinton Secretary of State Appointment Unconstitutional
10. Barack Obama may recruit defence chief Robert Gates
11. Kissinger, top GOP senator like Clinton for Sec of State
12. ‘Flying syringe’ mosquitos, other ideas get Gates funding

Ugly truth about foreign aid in Afghanistan

Global Research, May 12, 2009

Press TV - 2009-05-10

Exorbitant sums of international aid to Afghanistan are being lavished by Western aid agencies on their own officials in the conflict-stricken country. 

"In the United States, Britain, and other countries, people work and taxpayers pay money that goes to help Afghanistan to build roads, dams, and electricity lines," Ramazan Bashardost, an Afghan parliament member and former planning minister, said. 

Bashardost added, "But when the money comes to Afghanistan, it's spent on those people who have cars costing USD 60,000 and who live in houses with a USD 15,000 monthly rent. This money goes to these expenses -- 90 percent logistics and administration." 

The high expenditure on paying, protecting and accommodating Western aid officials in palatial style helps to explain why Afghanistan ranks 174th out of 178th on a UN ranking of countries' wealth. 

Districts across Afghan capital city, Kabul, have been taken over or rebuilt to accommodate Westerners working for aid agencies or embassies. 

"I have just rented out this building for USD 30,000 a month to an aid organization. It was so expensive because it has 24 rooms with en-suite bathrooms as well as armored doors and bullet-proof windows," Torialai Bahadery, the director of Property Consulting Afghanistan said. 

The cupidity of aid agencies and the foreign contractors that every bedroom should have an en-suite bathroom comes despite the fact that 77 percent of Afghans lack access to clean water. 

At a time when extreme poverty is turning young Afghans to fight for the Taliban, foreign consultants in Kabul can command salaries of USD 250,000 to USD 500,000 a year. 

The high degree of wastage of aid money in Afghanistan has even troubled the Afghan government. 

"I was in Badakhshan province in northern Afghanistan, which has a population of 830,000, most of whom depend on farming," said Matt Waldman, the head of policy and advocacy for Oxfam in Kabul. 

"The entire budget of the local department of agriculture, irrigation and livestock, which is extremely important for farmers in Badakhshan, is just USD 40,000. This would be the pay of an expatriate consultant in Kabul for a few months." 

The ugly truth about foreign aid in Afghanistan surfaces at the time when the country has seen rising levels of violence in recent months. Taliban insurgents have carried out a string of deadly attacks and now control large parts of the countryside where Afghan and international forces do not have enough manpower to maintain a permanent presence.